![]() ![]() Beyond the event horizon all directions point down (and that’s messed up geometry).Īnother way to look at it is gravity is generated by both matter and energy, so converting a black hole’s matter into energy wouldn’t change much. The big thing that makes matter and anti-matter different is that bringing them together makes them cancel each other out, dumping all of their intrinsic energy (of the “E=MC 2” variety) into a big boom.Įven if it did contact some matter inside, there’s no direction the explosion could go that doesn’t point toward the center. That is, if you were made of anti-matter, everything about you would be exactly the same (there are some subtleties with regard to neutrino emission, but who notices that?). Anti-matter, as the named doesn’t imply, is made of the same “stuff” as ordinary matter. So, if by setting off a bomb you could change how rulers measure distance in a particular region of space, then you could affect a black hole.Ĭhucking anti-matter into a black hole would actually make it bigger. Destroying a black hole is just as difficult as destroying any patch of space. Rather than thinking of them as solid objects, it’s better to think of them as “messed up patches of geometry”. Physicist: Black holes are a little tricky. The original question was: Aside from Hawking radiation, is it possible to destroy a black hole? Specifically, could you rotate a black hole fast enough that it was flung apart? Also, assuming that m is the mass necessary for a black hole (though I realize they’re more a density than mass thing), and you had a black hole of, say, 10m, could you throw some amount of anti matter at it (say 5m) to rip it apart without simply converting all it’s matter into energy?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |